点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
铁警裴志才：春运安保战线上的“老兵”******
中新网北京2月3日电 题：铁警裴志才：春运安保战线上的“老兵”
作者 邓有林
“老王，明天就立春了，最近几天风开始大了，树木上的枯枝容易吹上线路，平时还得多留意及时清理。”2月3日一大早，民警裴志才巡查到通州西站往南一公里的林场区段时，迎面撞见了北京工务段通州西林场工长王东明。
老哥俩年龄相仿，都扎根通州西站多年，林场靠近京承铁路线，虽说去年林场外侧加装了一道防护网，但确保线路通畅、列车平稳运行，两人都牵挂着安全。
今年55岁的裴志才是北京铁路公安处通州西站派出所的一名普通民警，1990年参加公安工作，33年来始终坚守在京承铁路线上，是一名扎根铁路沿线的“老兵”。
33年从警路，裴志才一步步走出了“平安心得”。维护沿线铁路安全，民警线路督导检查很重要，但也不能忽视基层群众的力量，广泛发动沿线村民共治共管，才能长治久安。朝着这个目标，裴志才走村入户，“跑断腿、磨破嘴”地开展安全宣传，长此以往他也成了辖区的“百家熟”、村民的“贴心人”。
张辛站是通州西站派出所下辖的一个驻站点，位于顺义区李桥镇张辛庄村，从派出所开车到这里需要半个小时。虽然每次线路督导检查时间紧任务重，但裴志才总要抽空到村民高老太太家坐坐，为她讲解反诈防骗常识。
铁警裴志才(左)帮助旅客 北京铁路公安局供图老太太今年70岁，是村里的留守老人，还经营着一家商店。“防范电信网络诈骗一个也不能少，老人更要常提醒，帮他们捂好‘钱袋子’。”有时候，裴志才工作太忙顾不上过去，他就定期给老太太打个电话。
从铁路沿线到站区，裴志才的工作任务有变化，但守护平安的初心始终如一。2020年，通州西站增开了密云、怀柔方向的市郊列车，通勤旅客一下子多了起来。
在日复一日的工作中，裴志才发现，和长途旅客列车不同，通勤旅客客流不大，但流动很快，旅客们大都踩着点进站乘车，候车时间很短，一旦有旅客遗落行李物品，很难第一时间归还失主。为此，勤巡视、多提醒成了他的习惯。
今年春运期间，通州西站每天发送、到达旅客列车11趟，列车都集中在早中晚上下班的时间段，每每赶上食堂开饭，他还坚守在工作岗位上。在他看来，饭可以晚点吃，但守护旅客平安不能有空档。
让在岗的每一分钟都有意义，裴志才执勤巡逻并不是走马观花的兜兜转转。时刻保持警觉，仔细观察发现，才能及时剔除安全隐患。有一次裴志才在站区出站口执勤时，发现一名瘦高个、长头发的男子通过地下通道，见出口有民警便刻意躲避，低着头紧贴身前旅客。裴志才立即察觉出异样，迅速上前拦住该男子，经询问盘查，原来该男子因涉嫌诈骗被公安机关网上通缉。
实战练精兵，多年的一线工作经历，让裴志强成了警务技能“多面手”。从站区执勤巡逻到线路督导检查，追缉网逃人员到治安打击，案件办理到内勤事务，每一项工作到了他手里总能游刃有余。
前不久，裴志才参加值乘的G915次列车抵达吉林站。旅客都下车后，他巡视车厢，发现行李架上有人遗落了一个行李袋，里面装了一打病历单和一些杂物，虽然没有贵重物品，但他还是立即联系了列车工作人员，通过病历单上的信息找到了失主。
当得知失主已经出站，而且年纪大了腿脚不好后，他便一路小跑将行李袋送到出站口物归原主。等他气喘吁吁再返回站台时，列车已变更为返京列车G916次，旅客们也已陆续开始上车。遇到有的旅客携带行李较多，热心肠的裴志才连忙上前“搭把手”，将行李搬上列车。见到带小孩的旅客时，他还不忘提醒注意站台与列车之间的缝隙。
东北的天气虽冷，但裴志才贴心的服务、温暖的话语却让旅客们感到心里很暖、很踏实。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)